Bug#800574: backport to sid/stable? (was RE: libc6: lock elision hazard on Intel Broadwell and Skylake)
On 2015-10-23 18:10, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 11:13, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
> > Should this patch be backported both to stable and unstable?
>
> It needs to go to stable sooner than later, yes. But it seems wise to
> let it cook in unstable/testing for a bit, first.
The patch is already committed to our stable branch:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-glibc?view=revision&revision=6644
The plan is to upload it to stable-proposed-updates once we have more
fixes in (mostly the nscd bugs) or we are getting close to the next
point release.
> I don't know what the plans for uploading new glibc to unstable are.
The plan is to get glibc 2.21 to unstable soon.
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: