Re: Missing accept4 for ia64
- To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
- Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, eglibc@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Missing accept4 for ia64
- From: Émeric Maschino <emeric.maschino@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 19:47:52 +0100
- Message-id: <CAA9xbM5kLgSg7py5j3BbZVM=BiEMXG6AW4=oRoJs_sgO5aB6Rw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20120128221420.GA9636@burratino>
- References: <E1Rnmk8-0002dx-GV@franck.debian.org> <CAA9xbM48ZAr77EfXukbm7GcQePdm41WHWpH--0iATsz_7zAT2A@mail.gmail.com> <handler.647825.D647825.13269593501142.notifdone@bugs.debian.org> <CAA9xbM7_O4u5kbnaqiXTUOsC122HpENevQzZ4XLGKGtDFMYrWw@mail.gmail.com> <1327763389.5400.253.camel@deadeye> <20120128214333.GQ19736@hall.aurel32.net> <1327787556.5400.269.camel@deadeye> <20120128220020.GT19736@hall.aurel32.net> <20120128220407.GC8958@burratino> <20120128221010.GU19736@hall.aurel32.net> <20120128221420.GA9636@burratino>
So, what is thus the "fixed" package version I should wait for?
Thanks,
Émeric
Le 28 janvier 2012 23:14, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 04:04:07PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>>>> Yes, it should probably work. Should I bump the build-dep on
>>>> linux-libc-dev to a recent version (in that case which version?).
>>>
>>> (>= 3.2.1-1) [ia64]
>>
>> This gives the version, not if the version should be bumped or not.
>
> Yes, the build-dep should be bumped. udev is broken without a working
> accept4 (bug#648325).
Reply to: