On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 22:43 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 03:09:49PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 13:41 +0100, Émeric Maschino wrote: > > > Hello Ben, > > > > > > IIRC, to completely fix this issue, (e)glibc must be recompiled > > > against updated kernel. > > > Is there a bug report to track this? > > > Do you know when this updated (e)glibc is planned? > > > > I'm not aware that there is a bug report on eglibc regarding this. > > > > I believe that only a binNMU is required, i.e. a request for a automatic > > rebuild. I'll leave that to the maintainers to decide. > > > > I am planning an upload probably tomorrow. That said, I don't know what > is the exact problem, so i don't know if it is going to be fixed with a > rebuild. accept4() was not implemented by Linux on ia64 for a long time. I believe eglibc will define the C wrapper automatically when built against the updated linux-libc-dev. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part