Re: Processed: reassign to glibc
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:42:39PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:34:58PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:01:59PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Please don't reassign a bug to libc6 because you see the word libc6 in
> > > the backtrace. A double free is a bug in the package, not in glibc.
> > >
> > > To get a usable backtrace, just recompile the package with -O0:
> >
> > I didn't get any response to my last query, so reassignment was the logical
>
> Sorry, but I have probably missed it. Given the ressource we have we are
> not able to treat all bugs, and even less to answer all mails.
>
> > recourse. But thanks for the attitude, really in tune with the Christmas
> > spirit :P
>
> Reassigning a bug without saying anything is also really annoying.
I sent you e-mail almost a month ago, and it's copied in the bug log.
> And building the package with -O0 is the first thing you learn when
> debugging.
Sorry, nobody told me that -g is mutually exclusive with -O2 - perhaps
you need to get some manuals updated.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: