Re: Processed: reassigning to glibc
reassign 312314 w3m
thanks
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:51:09PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> reassign 312314 glibc
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
> >> Bug#312314: w3m: "Absurd stack bottom value" error on a Grsecurity hardened system
> >> Bug reassigned from package `w3m' to `glibc'.
> >>
> >
> > I don't really understand why this bug has been reassigned to glibc. The
> > bug log only mentions libgc.
> >
> > Please come back with some arguments, meanwhile I am reassigning the bug
> > back to w3m.
>
> Because, as confirmed by a comment in the bug, this is a libc issue.
No, it is not written this is a libgc issue, not a libc issue. I suggest
you suggest to stop doing bug triaging if you can't see the difference.
> If you think that another library is the cause, please reassign to
> that.
I don't see why *I* should do that.
> At any rate, it's been confirmed that this is not caused by w3m code
> itself, so it's pointless to reassing back to w3m.
>
It is even more pointless to reassign it to glibc.
Reassigning a bug to a random package in the hope the maintainer of the
package will do the job is not really fair.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
Reply to: