Re: Processed: reassigning to glibc
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 12:51 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> reassign 312314 glibc
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
> >> Bug#312314: w3m: "Absurd stack bottom value" error on a Grsecurity hardened system
> >> Bug reassigned from package `w3m' to `glibc'.
> >>
> >
> > I don't really understand why this bug has been reassigned to glibc. The
> > bug log only mentions libgc.
[...]
> Because, as confirmed by a comment in the bug, this is a libc issue.
> If you think that another library is the cause, please reassign to
> that.
No, as Aurelien said, the bug log mentions libgc. libgc is not part of
glibc. If you believe the bug to be caused by libgc, reassign it there.
> At any rate, it's been confirmed that this is not caused by w3m code
> itself, so it's pointless to reassing back to w3m.
As the maintainer to whom the bug was reported, it's your responsibility
to ensure that the bug is reassigned to the correct package if so
required. Reassigning it to an unrelated package and saying "not my
fault, you fix it" doesn't do that.
Adam
Reply to: