A conversation with aurel32: <pabs> do you know if the glibc team plan to get glibc with dpkg symbol stuff into lenny, or is that a lenny+1 thing (#462444)? <aurel32> glibc is frozen <aurel32> so that won't happen for lenny <pabs> ah, bummer <aurel32> OTOH, I won't see why we should absolutely need that in lenny <aurel32> what is important is to have it in lenny + 1 <aurel32> so that packages from lenny + 1 are installable in lenny <pabs> sure, but if it was in lenny, packages from lenny could be installable in etch :) <aurel32> I am not so sure <aurel32> the dependencies not only come from dpkg-shlibdeps <aurel32> and in my opinion they are too much differences between etch and lenny so that can work for a wide range of packages <pabs> ok <pabs> would you mind if I add this information to the bug? or could you add some info? <aurel32> yes, don't hesitate to add some details to the bug log <pabs> thanks -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part