Bug#282692: acknowledged by developer (Re: Processed: [owner@bugs.debian.org: Processed: [horms@verge.net.au: Re: Bug#282692: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386: relocation error]])
- To: 282692@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#282692: acknowledged by developer (Re: Processed: [owner@bugs.debian.org: Processed: [horms@verge.net.au: Re: Bug#282692: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386: relocation error]])
- From: Ennio-Sr <nasr.laili@tin.it>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:51:02 +0100
- Message-id: <20041201135102.GA9983@Ennio-(Sr)@WouldBe-ei.hnet>
- Reply-to: nasr.laili@tin.it, 282692@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <handler.282692.D282692.110189112627388.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
- References: <811xeatn7u.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <20041123203417.925D04678A@deby.ei.hnet> <handler.282692.D282692.110189112627388.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
* Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org> [011204, 01:03]:
[cut]
> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:52:05 +0900
> Message-ID: <811xeatn7u.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
> From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
> To: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <frankie@debian.org>,
> 282692-done@bugs.debian.org, nasr.laili@tin.it,
> Horms <horms@debian.org>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Processed: [owner@bugs.debian.org: Processed: [horms@verge.net.au: Re: Bug#282692: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386: relocation error]]
> In-Reply-To: <handler.s.C.110182274525556.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
> References: <20041130134839.GB8076@gandalf.libero.it>
> <handler.s.C.110182274525556.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
> FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
> (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Delivered-To: 282692-done@bugs.debian.org
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
> (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
> autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> Please read /usr/share/doc/libc6/README.Debian.gz Q6.
>
I did, but it doesn't throw any light on the subject ... apart from the
ref to errno and to a broken package: but "which one?"
> > ls: relocation error: libpthread.so.0: symbol _errno, version GLIBC_2.0
> > not defined in file libc6.so.6 with link reference
>
> You use non debian version ls, or you install your version in
> /usr/local/bin, and so on.
How could I, having installed everithing from a Debian site? I
downloaded CD1 (or like) on Oct. 18, launched the installer and then
made all updates from debian sites.
May be the following info will clarify this point. Anyway, an update of
a few days ago gave me a new kernel-image (k-i-2 2.6.8-10): I'll try to
set up this one as soon as possible and will revert in any case.
Regards,
Ennio.
------------------------------------------------------
less /home/Deb*Content* |grep bin/ls
------------------------------------
bin/ls base/fileutils
bin/lsb_release misc/lsb-release
sbin/lsmod base/modutils
sbin/lspci admin/pciutils
usr/bin/lsattr base/e2fsprogs,deve
usr/bin/lsdev admin/procinfo,util
usr/bin/lsdic utils/canna-utils
usr/bin/lsfcc net/lsfcc
usr/bin/lsfcc1 net/lsfcc
usr/bin/lsh shells/lsh
usr/bin/lshell admin/lshell
usr/bin/lss16toppm base/syslinux
usr/bin/lssctl devel/rscheme
usr/lib/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi mail/listar-cgi
usr/lib/roxen2/bin/lsquota web/roxen2
usr/sbin/lslk utils/lslk
usr/sbin/lsof utils/lsof
usr/sbin/lsusb utils/usbutils
usr/share/doc/mh-book/examples/mh/bin/lsf doc/mh-book
dpkg -l |grep fileutils
-----------------------
ii fileutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU file management utilities (transitio
ls /var/cache/apt/archives/fileutils*
-------------------------------------
12 /var/cache/apt/archives/fileutils_5.2.1-2_all.deb
apt-get install fileutils -s
----------------------------
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
fileutils is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
--
[Perche' usare Win$ozz (dico io) se ..."anche uno sciocco sa farlo. \\?//
Fa' qualche cosa di cui non sei capace!" (diceva Henry Miller) ] (°|°)
[Why use Win$ozz (I say) if ... "even a fool can do that. )=(
Do something you aren't good at!" (as Henry Miller used to say) ]
Reply to: