Bug#182750: marked as done (libc6-dev: errno.h and unistd.h are empty except for reincluding themselves?)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:32:24 -0400
with message-id <1082813544.2844.1.camel@outpost.dnsalias.org>
and subject line Closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2003 18:01:24 +0000
>From davis@skink.net Thu Feb 27 12:01:23 2003
Return-path: <davis@skink.net>
Received: from bi01p1.nc.us.ibm.com (tadpole) [129.33.49.251]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18oSLS-0005Tn-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:01:22 -0600
Received: from root by tadpole with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18oSLM-00058p-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:01:16 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "John F. Davis" <davis@skink.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6-dev: errno.h and unistd.h are empty except for reincluding
themselves?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:01:16 -0500
Message-Id: <E18oSLM-00058p-00@tadpole>
X-BadReturnPath: root@tadpole.raleigh.ibm.com rewritten as davis@skink.net
using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1-14
Severity: normal
When I tried to build openafs modules, I was getting errors about to many nesting levels
in the above files. /usr/include/sys/errno.h and /usr/include/sys/unistd.h.
Someone please look at these files and see if this is how they should indeed look and if so, how
should they be resolved.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tadpole 2.4.18 #6 Thu Feb 27 11:25:02 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 182750-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2004 13:32:57 +0000
>From jbailey@raspberryginger.com Sat Apr 24 06:32:57 2004
Return-path: <jbailey@raspberryginger.com>
Received: from fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.74]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BHNH7-0001YI-00; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 06:32:57 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([65.49.88.87])
by fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP
id <20040424133109.NKHQ292072.fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@[192.168.1.10]>
for <182750-done@bugs.debian.org>;
Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:31:09 -0400
Subject: Closing this bug
From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@raspberryginger.com>
To: 182750-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XpKtRr2rqA7LSREDscsx"
Message-Id: <1082813544.2844.1.camel@outpost.dnsalias.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:32:24 -0400
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.88.87] using ID <jbailey01@rogers.com> at Sat, 24 Apr 2004 09:31:09 -0400
Delivered-To: 182750-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--=-XpKtRr2rqA7LSREDscsx
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As Daniel noted, using -I for system include directories is the source
of the trouble. Since there's been no follow up to this at all for over
a year, I'm closing this bug.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--=20
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
--=-XpKtRr2rqA7LSREDscsx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBAimxn5M5hmdCYCpkRAvGxAKCwBUMycAnZYpAv2B5ez8Qr9o4IqwCg5YLs
Jo+56p3pQcwRlyf7HTM+PIc=
=Tegx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-XpKtRr2rqA7LSREDscsx--
Reply to: