[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#231198: marked as done (gdm: zh_TW.BIG5 locale in locale.conf should be zh_TW.Big5)



On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 04:48:07PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:59:16AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > > This bug does not belong to the locales package (and is thus reassigned
> > > > back to gdm), zh_TW.BIG5 is a valid locale.
> > > > It should either be reassigned to xlibs-data by requesting an alias for
> > > > zh_TW.BIG5, or gdm filter can be fixed to generate zh_TW.Big5 instead.
> > >
> > > It _is_ a bug of the locales and/or xlibs-data package.  glibc should
> > > be listing locales that work both inside and outside of X in its
> > > SUPPORTED list.
> >
> > zh_TW.BIG5 is not listed in SUPPORTED.  You set this locale, so you
> > have to ensure that it is valid.
> 
> zh_TW BIG5 is, however.  glibc doesn't support specifying the encoding at
> runtime when it wasn't specified at locale generation time.

Wrong claim:
  $ LANG=zh_TW.BIG5 locale language
  Chinese

> gdm 2.4.4.7-1 only uses the names as specified at generation time, so
> this problem is fixed.  It would be nice if glibc supported specifying
> the encoding even when it is the default, however.

It does.

> (and that those locales also are locales that work with X)

Sure, anyone can file bugs against xlibs-data.

Denis



Reply to: