Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative

To: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Cc: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>, 231015@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 09:18:13 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 81isfze9tm.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
Reply-to: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>, 231015@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 81vfk5tbx5.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
References: <20040203235340.GA8336@bylbo.nowhere.earth> <81fzdq85ex.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <1075985103.1331.2.camel@outpost.dnsalias.org> <20040206184833.GA16799@kitenet.net> <81ekt16qw8.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <81ekryz721.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <1079102147.1616.3.camel@outpost.dnsalias.org> <811xnwyuhy.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <81y8q3xw5m.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <81wu5nxs6h.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <[🔎] 81vfk5tbx5.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>

clone 231015 -1
reassign -1 debhelper
retitle -1 dh_link does not work with relative symlink path
tags patch
thanks

I cloned this bug to debhelper because it's dh_link bug.

Regards,
-- gotom

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

References:
- Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
  - From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>

Prev by Date: Bug#236066: Forbidden relative symlink breaks package building [+ fix]
Next by Date: Processed: libc6: i586 optimized libs
Previous by thread: Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#231015: libm.so: symlink should be relative
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread