On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:32:27PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Please describe what exact packages are broken. The packages depends against libc6 (or what the shlibs file says), but there is nothing which can be resolved as libc6. Please don't try to argue, that versioned provides can't be resolved. This is only true for real packages, not for udeb which aren't covered by the policy. > At least the current d-i is working without problem. s/(rent)/\1 released/ The code is marked as waiting for external updates but stable. Bastian -- I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature