Bug#53931: libc6-bin: the db_* manpages should be handled by alternatives

To: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>, 53931@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#53931: libc6-bin: the db_* manpages should be handled by alternatives
From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 14:03:05 -0800
Message-id: <v04220804b4a92a34535d@[206.163.71.146]>
Reply-to: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>, 53931@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000103124452.A6880@polya>
References: <[🔎] 20000103124452.A6880@polya>

At 12:44 +0000 2000-01-03, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>Package: libc6-bin
>Version: 2.1.2-11
>
>The glibcdb_* binaries are symlinked to db_* using alternatives,
>however, the corresponding manpages are not.

I did this deliberately because libdb2.6-utils doesn't have manpages.
-- 
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)                    Debian GNU/Linux Developer
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org>                 <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
<URL:http://web.espy.org/>               <URL:http://www.debian.org/>

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#53931: libc6-bin: the db_* manpages should be handled by alternatives
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#54154: no zoneinfo when cross-compiling
Next by Date: Processed: nan.h should be standard on alpha
Previous by thread: Bug#53931: libc6-bin: the db_* manpages should be handled by alternatives
Next by thread: Solution to Critical dependancy problem in potato: libc6-dev
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread