Re: Newbie questions on packaging opencpn
On 17/09/18 21:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 9/17/18 7:30 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> On 17/09/18 18:57, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Still waiting on your explanation why the CRLF changes are needed.
>>> Before this issue is resolved, I will not sponsor the upload.
>>
>> Well, that means I need to investigate what happens if I follow this
>> path - my gut feeling obviously doesn't make it. I just havn't done
>> anything like this, and need to verify what happens Doable, but takes
>> time (and some toll on my motivation).
>
> Why did you implement the CRLF changes in the first place? Do you have
> past experience where CRLF in sources broke something?
Indeed - after all, this is the only point where I questioned your
judgment, right?
This really boils down to that we have different views and roles. I
could of course revert the repacking, especially now with all patches in
place. But I'm convinced that this will bite me in the future when
maintaining it.
You really dislike the repacking, enough to put my opencpn effort at
stake. Since you are the reviewer, it's something you could do.
We cannot really argue any more about this, all arguments have been
said. This is now about conflict resolution, and you are the reviewer.
So I'll try to revert the repacking.
Stay tuned,
Cheers!
--alec
Reply to: