Re: Modern packaging for postgis
On 10/10/2016 12:08 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/10/2016 12:04 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> Re: Sebastiaan Couwenberg 2016-10-10 <[🔎] 672ab2c9-0025-b062-6f28-9452bcf6df47@xs4all.nl>
>>>> thanks! I just pushed a simplified version that just does
>>>> /libsfcgal-dev/d.
>>>
>>> Thank for the change in pgapt. The only downside to your version is that
>>> the old format currently in use is no longer supported, and causes the
>>> removal of the libjson build dependencies too.
>>>
>>> If no new builds of the old packaging will be done this is not a
>>> problem, otherwise my patch is preferred which supports both formats
>>> (but will need improvement when the architecture restriction is removed).
>>
>> The idea was that I'm only supporting the new layout, yes.
>> Avoiding to collect old warts is a good thing I think :)
>
> Agreed.
>
> All we need now is for the failed postgis-source builds to be retried to
> verify that no other issues remain. Can you trigger the rebuilds?
>
> I'll merge the changes from the modern-packaging branch into master
> after the PGDG builds are all OK.
Since the PGDG builds are now fixed, I've merged the changes into master
and prepared a new upload to unstable.
Thanks for Markus and Christoph for their work on the PGDG side!
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Reply to: