Re: gfortran transition (Was: debian-release@list.debian.org)
On 08/14/2015 03:12 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 14-08-15 14:54, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So I've kicked off the gfortran transition. Based on the bug list
>> in #790757, I've rebuild packages and done NMUs to DELAYED/3-day
>>
>> The current status:
>>
>> * libgetdata: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * grib-api : uploaded.
>> * hdf5: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * mpich: uploaded * netcdf:
>> See the netcdf transition. * openmpi : uploaded * petsc: NMU
>> uploaded to DELAYED/3-day * qd: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/3-day *
>> slepc: Depends on petsc. #788123. * libxc: NMU uploaded to
>> DELAYED/3-day * oasis3 : Depends on netcdf * adios: depends on
>> netcdf * etsf-io: depends on netcdf * elmerfem : RC BUGS. Not in
>> testing (netcdf, gfortran introduce no new bugs) * plplot: RC Bugs.
>> Not in testing. * cmor: * Ships .mod file, not used by any package
>> currently. * Wait until netcdf transition starts, then rebuild.
>>
>>
>> On the related libterralib, libdap transitions: libdap: * libdap
>> uploaded. * grads: upload tomorrow. * gdal: Depend on metcdf
>>
>> libterralib: * libterralib: uploaded * magics++, metview will be
>> uploaded after netcdf transition starts.
>>
>> AIUI, the netcdf transition should be ready. Bas, Nico, can you
>> confirm?
>
> The netcdf packages in experimental are pretty much ready, but there
> are some outstanding issues [1] and unanswered questions from the
> previous discussion [2]. It seems with several RMs on vacation noone
> is available to answer them from the Release Team side. I prefer to
> wait until the Release Team is available before continuing with these
> transitions.
gfortran and g++ are entangled, so from my point of view go ahead with it,
however I can't formally approve it.
Matthias
Reply to: