Re: Merging GRASS upstream packaging with DebianGIS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 21.07.2015 12:11, sebastic wrote:
> On 2015-07-21 11:26, Ivan Minčík wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:02 AM, sebastic <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-07-21 10:33, Ivan Mincik wrote:
>>>
>>>> * create separate branch (based on current experimental
>>>> branch) on alioth repository [2] which will be used by GRASS
>>>> upstream for their daily builds for Ubuntu on Launchpad. What
>>>> could be the best name for this branch ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> All branches used for the upstream GRASS packaging should be
>>> prefixed with 'grass/' to distinguish it from the packaging
>>> branches for Debian and UbuntuGIS.
>>>
>>> See also the related documentation in the Debian GIS Policy:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/policy/repositories.html#other-git-branches
>>>
>>
>>
>>>
Sebastiaan, thank you very much for your quick response. So I will create
>> branch 'grass/daily' or rather 'grass/ubuntu/daily' ?
>
> I don't think the ubuntu string is needed in the branch name, so
> the former is better.
>
> If the packages will be built with git-buildpackage I suggest the
> to mirror the typical gbp layout:
>
> grass/master grass/pristine-tar grass/upstream
Hi Bas, I am trying to finish my packaging for GRASS daily builds. I
am using 'grass/master' and 'grass/upstream' branches as you proposed,
but I am not sure about 'grass/pristine-tar'. There is no
configuration in 'gbp.conf' to specify 'pristine-tar' branch. Is it
really needed ? If yes, do you have any advice how to configure it ?
>
> Since the upstream GRASS code includes a debian directory, a
> single branch should be sufficient, but it's not compatible with
> git-buildpackage (by default at least).
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
>
- --
Ivan Minčík
ivan.mincik@gmail.com GPG: 0x79529A1E
http://imincik.github.io/0x79529A1E.key
ivan.mincik@gista.sk GPG: 0xD714B02C
http://imincik.github.io/0xD714B02C.key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVtkNCAAoJEPfdLsR5Upoe6QkH/jhAt0Ib3HAQTTT28XJRDWjb
zM7zpqThQioKsPDu06tZOK0SuNw+b/whElwtEJm2/MQDkgn4W04T+xHrAUNOjK+3
mY5D2vfWev/nPOvq2qFQG3Wrmo+ebCW/EZC8gKWwsUd2KhhyHQEZGwD4efifbZiS
kbj91RzPXXPUtH6A3K5n6vsHHufpa/oQSHvg6rXiGUrXchsSGFoPef7cWil6+JN6
gXihO50ZKfDuwM+DGx5lZDISQ63cnPZi3zo0So7NYDovFyLl/TtsM1ET7C32/Z9F
5KcrPOXXzzCVTReTNJaWz+QMgb+pSvozgJa3m9GosJ7cOnfPNc0dn+35ZQmjDJw=
=qctH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: