Thanks for looking fixing these build failures so quickly Bas. On 06/27/2015 07:46 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 06/24/2015 12:46 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 04/18/2015 11:35 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> We should now have updated all netCDF related packages >>> maintained in the Debian GIS team, we're mostly waiting for the >>> various netCDF packages to pass NEW now. >> >> All netCDF related packages have now passed the NEW queue, but >> there are some build failures we need to fix before we can consider >> these packages for unstable. >> >> netcdf: >> >> configure failure on hurd-i386, probably easy to fix by moving the >> doxygen stuff to the build-indep target. >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=netcdf&arch=hurd-i386&ver=1%3A4.3.3.1%2Bds-1~exp2&stamp=1434470062 > > Only >> > this build failure on hurd-i386 is an outstanding issue for the > new netcdf packages. All other netcdf packages now build successfully, > the occasional test failure is now ignored. > > I'm currently not able to look into the hurd-i386 FTBFS because both > porterboxes are down. I also note some "un-reproducibility" with the netcdf packages in experimental. I quickly tried to fix -fortran with the usual doxygen timestamp fix, but it did not seem to work. More investigation is required. Also on my "todo" is to complete a rebuild of the c++ rdepends and re-summarise where we are. Nico & Alastair have at least made progress with vtk6 & magics++ and the legacy package. The same is probably required for the other c++ rdepends. Then the "c" rdepends. Then I guess we need bugs for the build failures and to provide a ben for the transition tracking bug that includes the legacy package in "good". When is the best time to change the Multi-Arch stanzas? Regards, Ross
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature