Re: GDAL 2.0.0

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>]

On 06/14/2015 11:33 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> I expect we'll need to resolve quite a number of issues in
> the reverse dependencies to work with GDAL 2.0.0 before we can consider
> it for unstable.

Once source for issues with the upcoming gdal (2.0.0-1) is the removal
of the libgdal1-dev transitional package. Since gdal (1.9.0-1)
libgdal-dev should be used instead.

I've filed bugs with patches for the two packages that still
unconditionally build depend on libgdal1-dev. Both bugreports use the
gdal-2.0 usertag for convenient reference via:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=gdal-2.0;users=debian-gis@lists.debian.org

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1