On 06/20/2015 05:51 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 06/14/2015 11:39 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 06/14/2015 10:55 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: >>> As it is going to have to go through the NEW queue, and if it >>> builds okay without -dcw & -gshhg, shouldn't we target >>> experimental and upload? > >> Yes, since libgmt had a SONAME bump the new gmt package should >> first be uploaded to experimental. > > Now that gmt-dcw & gmt-gshhg have been accepted, I've uploaded the > first gmt 5 revision to experimental. > > Once that's passed the NEW queue I'll try to reproduce the many > outstanding gmt bugs to see if they're still applicable to GMT 5. I > expect we can close many of them. > > Kind Regards, > > Bas Many thanks for pushing this through Bas. Real life is getting in the way at the moment. But I can will try and fit in a little bug triage here and there as well. It is a good way to learn the package. Ross
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature