Re: sfcgal package for postgis and others
Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> I'm not aware of BTS issues, are you sure it's not just a timeout
> getting the list of wnpp issues?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787901
Just try to call querybts wnpp
> There are only two commits on the master branches after the 1.1.0
> release, the Mac compile issue is not relevant for the Debian package
> build and the clang warning likely isn't either.
OK, fair enough.
The only change needed for the postgis package would be this one:
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 93e9de1..0a3c6ef 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Uploaders: Stephen Frost <sfrost@debian.org>, Francesco
Paolo
Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), po-debconf,
dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~), autotools-dev, dh-autoreconf, autoconf2.13,
- flex, bison, rdfind, libgeos-dev (>= 3.3),
+ flex, bison, rdfind, libgeos-dev (>= 3.3), libsfcgal-dev,
libjson-c-dev | libjson0-dev (>= 0.9~),
libproj-dev (>= 4.6.0), libssl-dev, xsltproc, docbook, docbook-xsl,
imagemagick, libcunit1-dev, dblatex, libxml2-dev (>= 2.5.0~),
As my account is active now I just pushed sfcgal.git to alioth.
Regards
Sven
--
"Thinking of using NT for your critical apps?
Isn't there enough suffering in the world?"
(Advertisement of Sun Microsystems in Wall Street Journal)
/me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
Reply to: