Re: netCDF Strategy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 06/09/2015 09:41 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> I am happy to start at the bottom of the c package and work up?
That's not a good idea. Dependency level > 1 packages have a
dependency on the transitioning package but also on one or more the
other reverse dependencies of the transition package. You need to have
all these rebuilt with the transitioning package before building the
next dependency level.
Because packages like vtk6 depend on the netcdf & netcdf-cxx libaries,
those cannot be tested with only the new netcdf.
If you look at the bottom of the transition tracker you'll see the
collisions with other transitions, all packages listed for netcdf-c++
& netcdf-fortran need to be rebuilt with that and the new netcdf library
.
To test the packages that only depend on the netcdf library you need
to start with Dependency level 1 and rebuild all packages that don't
have a collision with the netcdf-cxx nor netcdf-fortran transition.
The netcdf transition in my tracker combines all three libraries in a
single tracker. That can be discarded until we have netcdf-cxx &
netcdf-fortan in experimental too.
Kind Regards,
Bas
- --
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=lmmn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: