Re: netCDF Strategy
- To: debian-gis@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: netCDF Strategy
- From: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 23:23:33 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 550B4C65.3060504@xs4all.nl>
- In-reply-to: <54B801B4.3010805@the-gammons.net>
- References: <CAK6Z60fEHG_N9_Hf5iXi=OUav0UAfZqQq7zNBO3X4oVVDq0pkw@mail.gmail.com> <dc1865af115c87de23ff214a21d330eb.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <CAK6Z60f8S-b8mH_Ey4BfkBiUD8QhtnFNQTso13ex=-UJvhW4Cw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK6Z60f-GFDME0bKJVKOJHnx=4DtUd_jZkt1oZ_cT8+niMNnPA@mail.gmail.com> <19806aa4c1748e9139818b2f86d1154f.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <CAK6Z60fSifowUUToO0ycHS02cTNTN1_MWF9Rai=NT3iMeV6hVQ@mail.gmail.com> <54B801B4.3010805@the-gammons.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 01/15/2015 07:06 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea to finalise your package and get
> it uploaded to "experimental" soon. It will take some time to
> confirm that all these dependencies work with the new library
> before we move it to unstable.
I just uploaded netcdf 4.3.3.1 to experimental, once it passes the NEW
queue we can more easily test the reverse dependencies in preparation
for the transition.
In the mean time there are new upstream releases for ncview, and we
still have two outstanding ITPs for netcdf-python:
ITP: netcdf-python
https://bugs.debian.org/778417
ITP: python-netcdf4
https://bugs.debian.org/730666
There are some concerns raised in the second ITP about the various
python netcdf packages that are also discussed in the first ITP. We
need to resolve this and preferably keep only the best one.
Kind Regards,
Bas
- --
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=Vv3l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: