Re: netCDF Strategy
- To: debian-gis@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: netCDF Strategy
- From: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 18:05:35 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 54F88CDF.1080100@xs4all.nl>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAK6Z60ceGsEk5dSaOQfEn4T_CfQOyBfKVa-C6tm=A5b3_uhSBQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAK6Z60fEHG_N9_Hf5iXi=OUav0UAfZqQq7zNBO3X4oVVDq0pkw@mail.gmail.com> <dc1865af115c87de23ff214a21d330eb.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <CAK6Z60f8S-b8mH_Ey4BfkBiUD8QhtnFNQTso13ex=-UJvhW4Cw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK6Z60f-GFDME0bKJVKOJHnx=4DtUd_jZkt1oZ_cT8+niMNnPA@mail.gmail.com> <19806aa4c1748e9139818b2f86d1154f.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <CAK6Z60fSifowUUToO0ycHS02cTNTN1_MWF9Rai=NT3iMeV6hVQ@mail.gmail.com> <54B801B4.3010805@the-gammons.net> <54B9122A.4020704@xs4all.nl> <54B9A68A.1030007@xs4all.nl> <54C3CC9E.5010304@the-gammons.net> <54C3D19F.9080608@xs4all.nl> <54C3DE35.5050208@the-gammons.net> <CAK6Z60fY30=9k5JY3zGv0zbXXsAYq0pSxD7Cq01avifKX6J9RA@mail.gmail.com> <54C3EDBB.9080605@the-gammons.net> <54DF1550.5020608@the-gammons.net> <CAK6Z60dDEXfDcPW=w0y_erM2WbXiYM8pHD0_cornWRykEx+QtA@mail.gmail.com> <54DF3E97.3050001@the-gammons.net> <54E79FAB.1090705@xs4all.nl> <[🔎] CAK6Z60ceGsEk5dSaOQfEn4T_CfQOyBfKVa-C6tm=A5b3_uhSBQ@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 03/05/2015 05:59 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Just for you to be aware, there has been a quick-fix release
> 4.3.3.1 at netCDF [1]. Btw, what's the status of netCDF? (I haven't
> seen it in experimental yet [2].)
netcdf-cxx & netcdf-fortran are in NEW for 3 weeks now, no upload of
netcdf 4.3.3 has been done yet.
I assumed you'd continue with netcdf itself. If not, then obviously
someone else has to take care of that.
Kind Regards,
Bas
- --
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=lGHk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: