Re: netCDF Strategy
- To: Ross Gammon <ross@the-gammons.net>
- Cc: debian-gis@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: netCDF Strategy
- From: Nico Schlömer <nico.schloemer@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:27:58 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] CAK6Z60dDEXfDcPW=w0y_erM2WbXiYM8pHD0_cornWRykEx+QtA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 54DF1550.5020608@the-gammons.net>
- References: <CAK6Z60fEHG_N9_Hf5iXi=OUav0UAfZqQq7zNBO3X4oVVDq0pkw@mail.gmail.com> <dc1865af115c87de23ff214a21d330eb.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <CAK6Z60f8S-b8mH_Ey4BfkBiUD8QhtnFNQTso13ex=-UJvhW4Cw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK6Z60f-GFDME0bKJVKOJHnx=4DtUd_jZkt1oZ_cT8+niMNnPA@mail.gmail.com> <19806aa4c1748e9139818b2f86d1154f.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <CAK6Z60fSifowUUToO0ycHS02cTNTN1_MWF9Rai=NT3iMeV6hVQ@mail.gmail.com> <54B801B4.3010805@the-gammons.net> <54B9122A.4020704@xs4all.nl> <54B9A68A.1030007@xs4all.nl> <54C3CC9E.5010304@the-gammons.net> <54C3D19F.9080608@xs4all.nl> <54C3DE35.5050208@the-gammons.net> <CAK6Z60fY30=9k5JY3zGv0zbXXsAYq0pSxD7Cq01avifKX6J9RA@mail.gmail.com> <54C3EDBB.9080605@the-gammons.net> <[🔎] 54DF1550.5020608@the-gammons.net>
> I see that NetCDF 4.3.3 (final version) has been released:
> https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf-c/releases/tag/v4.3.3
Finally! :)
> Now might be a good time to merge the split-c-f-cxx branch into the
> master branch, and then import the final release there? I am happy to do
> the merge,
I too believe merging into master is the cleanest solution.
Cheers,
Nico
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Ross Gammon <ross@the-gammons.net> wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> I see that NetCDF 4.3.3 (final version) has been released:
> https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf-c/releases/tag/v4.3.3
>
> Now might be a good time to merge the split-c-f-cxx branch into the
> master branch, and then import the final release there? I am happy to do
> the merge, as some of the cruft in the master branch is my mess (before
> I found out that you were working on it). Then you will have a clean
> place to finalise the package.
>
> Alternatively, we could do the merge when we eventually release to unstable.
>
> Let us know either way.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ross
>
>
>
Reply to: