Re: netCDF Strategy
- To: debian-gis@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: netCDF Strategy
- From: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:42:18 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 54DF187A.3060503@xs4all.nl>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 54DF1550.5020608@the-gammons.net>
- References: <CAK6Z60fEHG_N9_Hf5iXi=OUav0UAfZqQq7zNBO3X4oVVDq0pkw@mail.gmail.com> <dc1865af115c87de23ff214a21d330eb.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <CAK6Z60f8S-b8mH_Ey4BfkBiUD8QhtnFNQTso13ex=-UJvhW4Cw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK6Z60f-GFDME0bKJVKOJHnx=4DtUd_jZkt1oZ_cT8+niMNnPA@mail.gmail.com> <19806aa4c1748e9139818b2f86d1154f.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <CAK6Z60fSifowUUToO0ycHS02cTNTN1_MWF9Rai=NT3iMeV6hVQ@mail.gmail.com> <54B801B4.3010805@the-gammons.net> <54B9122A.4020704@xs4all.nl> <54B9A68A.1030007@xs4all.nl> <54C3CC9E.5010304@the-gammons.net> <54C3D19F.9080608@xs4all.nl> <54C3DE35.5050208@the-gammons.net> <CAK6Z60fY30=9k5JY3zGv0zbXXsAYq0pSxD7Cq01avifKX6J9RA@mail.gmail.com> <54C3EDBB.9080605@the-gammons.net> <[🔎] 54DF1550.5020608@the-gammons.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 02/14/2015 10:28 AM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Now might be a good time to merge the split-c-f-cxx branch into
> the master branch, and then import the final release there? I am
> happy to do the merge, as some of the cruft in the master branch is
> my mess (before I found out that you were working on it). Then you
> will have a clean place to finalise the package.
>
> Alternatively, we could do the merge when we eventually release to
> unstable.
Merging the split-c-f-cxx branch into master for 4.3.3 seems
appropriate. If there are changes for 4.1.3 we need to get into jessie
that can done in the jessie branch.
Kind Regards,
Bas
- --
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=L66M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: