Re: netCDF Strategy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 01/24/2015 05:47 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> 1. We claim in the changelog that Multi-Arch is enabled, but I am
> not sure we have done this fully according to
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/advanced.en.html#multiarch
>
>
>
We have the files installing to the correct paths, but I can't see the
> "Multi-Arch" stanzas in d/control.
We have indeed not yet marked the packages. libnetcdf and the -dbg &
- -dev package should become Multi-Arch: same, whereas netcdf-bin should
become Multi-Arch: foreign.
> On 01/17/2015 01:02 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> libCF is still TODO
>
> ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775584
I have basic packaging ready for libCF, but we should decide on the
source package name. Initially I used just 'libcf' too, but then opted
to change it to 'netcdf-libcf' because it's so closely related to
netcdf in general, and because libcf is split out from the netcdf package.
Unfortunately there are only a couple of alpha and one beta release
published upstream, and it doesn't look very actively developed. So I
have my doubts about the usefulness of keeping libCF in Debian.
One of the outstanding issues I have with the libCF packaging is that
it builds both libcf.so.1 and libcf_src.so.1 and the difference is not
clear to me. libcf in netcdf 4.1.3 only has a single version of the
library.
Kind Regards,
Bas
- --
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=lN3k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: