Re: netCDF Strategy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 01/16/2015 02:29 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 07:06 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
>> I am happy to help package the fortran & C++ libraries if you
>> wish. I am sure Bas would help if he has time as well. We would
>> probably need to coordinate these packages as part of the
>> transition.
>
> I totally agree that the split-c-f-cxx branch needs to be
> finalized and uploaded to experimental, and that the other language
> libraries need to be packaged too. Maybe you can already start with
> the Fortran and C++ libraries?
The netcdf-cxx & netcdf-fortan packages are mostly ready in git. I
only expect minor changes in the near future.
ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/775520
Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/netcdf-cxx.git
ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/775524
Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/netcdf-fortran.git
The netcdf-dbg package should become a transitional package
recommending the C, C++ & Fortran debug packages, and the debugging
symbols for NetCDF C moved to libnetcdf-dbg.
libCF is still TODO
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/index.html#libcf
We may also want to package python-netcdf4, which has a different
source from python-netcdf already in the archive.
https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python
Kind Regards,
Bas
- --
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=AAMb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: