Re: netCDF Strategy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi Ross,
Thanks for starting this netCDF thread on debian-gis@, I took the
liberty to fix the subject a bit.
On 01/15/2015 07:06 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 09:52 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote: I can see the C
> library package name has been changed to libnetcdfc7 in your
> `split-c-f-cxx` branch. We should double check this, as many
> packages would need bugs to be filed to update their dependencies.
> Now the package only contains the C library, and the fortran, and
> C++ libraries have to be package separately. This is necessary,
> because there are many packages depending on them as well (See [1]
> & [2]). The tarballs are here:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/downloads/netcdf/index.jsp libcf0 does
> not seem to have any reverse dependencies. There is also a java
> package that we might as well do at the same time?
>
> I think it would be a good idea to finalise your package and get
> it uploaded to "experimental" soon. It will take some time to
> confirm that all these dependencies work with the new library
> before we move it to unstable.
>
> I am happy to help package the fortran & C++ libraries if you wish.
> I am sure Bas would help if he has time as well. We would probably
> need to coordinate these packages as part of the transition.
I totally agree that the split-c-f-cxx branch needs to be finalized
and uploaded to experimental, and that the other language libraries
need to be packaged too. Maybe you can already start with the Fortran
and C++ libraries?
Kind Regards,
Bas
- --
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=ttze
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: