[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: pyresample and pykdtree (was PtTroll)



Hi Andreas,

Il 24/06/2014 13:24, Andreas Tille ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:42:00PM +0200, Antonio Valentino wrote:
>>>> tests could most probably also be uased as examples for programmers.
>>>> And yes, I personally gave done similar things in the past since I think
>>
>> can you please provide some pointer to samplepackages
> 
> git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/python-pysam.git
>  
>>> Since I noticed the SoB entry I tried building the latest Git status but
>>> some tests are failing:
>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>> OSError: [Errno 38] Function not implemented
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Ran 98 tests in 156.020s
>>>
>>> FAILED (errors=6)
>>> debian/rules:21: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed
>>> make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 1
>>>
>>>
>>> This happens in an up to date pbuilder environment on amd64
>>> architecture.  I personally did not dived into the code (nor will I find
>>> time to do so) but if you do not have any clue I'd recommend consulting 
>>>    debian-python@lists.debian.org
>>>
>>> Thanks for your work on this
>>>
>>>       Andreas. 
>>
>> It is probably an issue related to the python multiptocessing package.
>> You should ensure to have the shared memory enabled in your environment.
>> For pbuilder it is probably just a matter of mounting /dev/shm in your
>> chroot.
> 
> Hmmm, there should be no need to fiddle around with some pbuilder
> settings since if I would be forced to do this the autobuilders for
> other architectures will fail later.  Can you confirm that you are
> able to build the package in a pbuilder environment?
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>          Andreas.
> 

yes, it works out of the box using

$ git-pbuilder create

and

$ git-buildpackage -us -uc --git-pbuilder

I created a new python-pyresample-test as requested and now pyresample
can be tested with autopkgtest.

cheers

-- 
Antonio Valentino


Reply to: