Re: SpatiaLite transition

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>]

Good news everyone, we got the go ahead. \o/

If the QGIS 2.2 builds for experimental succeed, we can upload 2.2.0-1
to unstable as part of the SpatiaLite transition.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Bug#731402: transition: spatialite
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 18:58:10 +0100
From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
To: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>, 731402@bugs.debian.org,
       731403@bugs.debian.org

Control: tag -1 confirmed

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 16:55:15 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:

> Thanks for setting up the trackers.
>
> As just posted to the debian-gis list:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/02/msg00004.html
>
> Am I correct that when we get the go ahead the transition process will
> be as follows?
>
>  1) upload spatialite             4.1.1-6 to unstable
>  2) upload librasterlite           1.1g-4 to unstable
>  3) binnmu mapnik             2.2.0+ds1-6 in unstable
>  4) upload libgaiagraphics          0.5-2 to unstable
>  5) upload spatialite-tools       4.1.1-3 to unstable
>  6) upload spatialite-gui         1.7.1-3 to unstable
>  7) upload pyspatialite           3.0.1-5 to unstable
>  8) binnmu gdal             1.10.1+dfsg-3 in unstable
>  9) binnmu merkaartor            0.18.1-3 in unstable
> 10) binnmu qgis                   2.0.1-2 in unstable
>

Looks about right.

> The new patches for the QGIS issues on ARM seem to work, the build
> started last night completed successfully. When the fixed qgis
> reaches unstable we're all set to rebuild the above packages.
>

Feel free to start the uploads to unstable.  Let us know when binNMUs
can be scheduled.

Cheers,
Julien

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1