[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#712688: transition: gdal



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 12/31/2013 03:29 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
> Dear Francesco and Bas, I was trying to read all possible
> information (bug reports, debian/changelog, mailing list) about the
> libgdal1h issue and transition, but still, it is not clear for me
> what the current state is and what it needs to be done to complete
> this task.
> 
> Please, could you summarize current situation ? Is it possible
> that GDAL 10 packaging will be fully completed soon enough to get
> to Ubuntu 14.04 LTS in best shape ?

Hi Ivan,

The current situation with GDAL in Debian is that 1.10.1+dfsg-2 is in
unstable:

http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdal.html

And the transition is almost complete, as can be seen in the
transition tracker:

http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdal.html

The remaining packages are waiting for the new openscenegraph 3.2.1
package in unstable before they can be rebuild:

http://bugs.debian.org/720816

The osmium package is not maintained by the Debian GIS team and may
need an NMU to rebuild with the new GDAL.

As Johan van de Wauw mentioned, the GDAL 1.10.1+dfsg-2 package has
been synced from Debian into Ubuntu.

An outstanding issue with the GDAL 1.10.1 package in Debian is that we
still need to update the symbols files.

The README.source states that this process involved "a bit of vi/sed
magics", which I didn't use but a quick and dirty Perl script.

So I've asked Francesco to review my changes first. They live in my
person git clone for the moment:

http://git.linuxminded.nl/?p=pkg-grass/gdal;a=commitdiff;h=47717db65c97c8d0b3e293976aa3963fc406318d

I should probably rerun the script on the 1.10.1+dfsg-2 packages to
see if the changes remained stable between -1 and -2.

Kind Regards,

Bas

- -- 
GnuPG: 0xE88D4AF1 (new) / 0x77A975AD (old)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=7Ybv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: