On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 19/04/2012 14:44, Francesco P. Lovergine ha scritto: > > That should go as a separate package probably. Many people could be interested > > in not being upset by a forced upgrade to 2. > agreed. does this impact the packaging schedule? > all the best. > Not specifically, just a branching and adaptation for a separate package is requested. -- Francesco P. Lovergine