[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [DebianGIS] osgearth and tinyows



Hi Johan,

Thanks a lot for reviewing!

Am Dienstag, 12. Oktober 2010, um 16.57:49 schrieb Johan Van de Wauw:
> I will review your package.
> 
> some first remarks:
> *check the lintian errors and warnings that you get while building
> your package. there are quite a few. Adding -i will give you more
> info.
> lintian -i osgearth_1.4.1-1_amd64.changes
> lintian -i osgearth_1.4.1-1.dsc
> *Best to this on a debian unstable installation, since it contains the
> newest version of lintian.
> *debian/copyright: you can refer to /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2
>  it's best to use the same license for the package rather than a different
> one. *debian/copyright: some files have a different license and some
> copyright holders are missing. Using
> licensecheck -r --copyright in your source directory may help.
> 
> Perhaps a svn/git repository for the package can be set up on alioth.
> Which one would you prefer?

git!

> 
> I'll have a closer look later.

Thanks,
Pirmin

> 
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Francesco P. Lovergine
> 
> <frankie@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:11:44AM +0200, Pirmin Kalberer wrote:
> >> Hi Ivan,
> >> 
> >> So I have to report an ITP and then upload the packages to
> >> mentors.debian.net. And then updating
> >> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis/PackageList ?
> > 
> > Yes, those are the first steps. It is also needed having a contact with
> > people who can review and eventually upload your packages. Note that
> > developing on stable is sub-optimal, anyway: packages that should go
> > into the archive are targeted for sid/unstable.
> > 
> > --
> > Francesco P. Lovergine
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pkg-grass-general mailing list
> > Pkg-grass-general@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-general


-- 
Pirmin Kalberer
Sourcepole  -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
http://www.sourcepole.com



Reply to: