* Francesco P. Lovergine (frankie@debian.org) wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:58:04PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > Anyway, talking with Stephen Frost that package does not seem in great shape... > > > > and talking of that, if you had a better version available, it can > be re-uploaded in incoming without waiting its approving. I'd strongly encourage getting the right package names and dependencies and whatnot done *before* it gets into the archive where other things may start to depend on it. Not to mention that if it has to be changed again it'll have to again go through the NEW queue. Let's take this opportunity to get it done right. Additionally, it sounds like they're trying to minimize the things which depend on postgres-8.0 because it's going to be removed eventually now that 8.1 is in (we certainly wouldn't want to release etch with multiple versions of Postgres if we can help it). This also means that, really, we just need postgresql-8.1-postgis and one PostGIS build for now. Going forward we'd probably need to support multiple versions at once but it'd be nice if we could avoid it until we have to. Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature