On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:06:11PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:43:45PM +0100, Silke Reimer wrote: > > OK. We have to accept this though we will have the same problem > > with other distributions as well (as Fedora for example where > > gdal is not far from being accepted for Fedora Extra). > > > > Since I am not keen to use sonames on a system that are not > > supported by upstream I vote for renaming the library itself: > > > > instead of libgdal.so we should have libgdal<gdalversion>.so > > > > This would require to patch mapserver, qgis etc. so that they > > link against libgdal<gdalversion> instead of libgdal. > > > > The package name should be > > libgdal1-<gdalversion> resp. libgdal1-<gdalversion>-dev as we > > already decided last week. > > > > What do you think? > > > > The same conclusion already reached last week. Not exactly. We just decided about package name, not library name. Silke -- Intevation GmbH Georgstrasse 4 49074 Osnabrück, Germany http://intevation.de http://intevation.de/~silke FreeGIS.org http://freegis.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature