Re: [DebianGIS] gdal package names?
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 18:03 +0100, Silke Reimer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:15:40PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:03:07AM -0500, Steve Halasz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > libgdal1-1.3
> > > > libgdal1-1.3-dev
> > > >
> > > > could suffices.
> > >
> > > I like having the minor version in there since the expectation is that
> > > the ABI will change even for minor versions.
> > >
> >
> > Well the C++ ABI could change also independently by the ustream intentions
> > (as the latest migration in sid showned) and could require appending
> > some more exotic suffix. Anyway, here we go... I added a couple of
> > details in the changelog on CVS. Whenever you did the last change
> > we can upload and start the Great Sync for all dependent packages
> > whenever the package would pass the NEW queue.
>
> I lost track of the open problems. If I look at the BTS it seems that
> only http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=309165 is open
> which should be solved automatically by the new version. Right?
>
Yes, this was fixed in 1.3. There are a couple of lintian errors that
Petter would like addressed before he sponsors the upload:
W: gdal source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.1
E: libgdal1.3.1-1-dev: lengthy-symlink usr/include/gdal ../include
And the package names need to be changed to the agreed on format.
Steve
> I ask because I definately have a few hours on Saturday where I could
> work on preparing a new gdal package or any other correlated work.
>
> Silke
>
Reply to: