Re: [DebianGIS] gdal package names?
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:57:23AM +0100, Silke Reimer wrote:
> I agree completely with you. I already statet on this list that I
> wouldn't included that version in the package name. In my opinion the
> soname is not exactly correlated to the software version - even when
> the soname has to change each time a new gdal version is released due
> to the not yet stable C++ ABI.
>
> I would suggest to add the soname to the package name and use the gdal
> version as debian version, i.e. libgdal<soname>-dev-1.3.1-1,
> libgdal<soname>-1.3.1-1 etc.
>
Sigh, you mean libgdal1-1.3.1 and libgdal1-1.3.1-dev as package name, I
suppose...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: