Re: [Pkg-grass-general] RFS: grass 6.0.0beta1 CVS - tempfile bug fixed
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 10:21:45AM +0100, Silke Reimer wrote:
> > Already suggested that more and more time...
> > Embedding the needed library within the grass source is the way to go IMHO.
>
> This is one solution. Another solution could be, not to rename the
> grass-libs each time a new grass package ist create. I called the
> gdal library libdal1 which is valid as long as all gdal-libs are
> compatible with each other. As soon as a completly new version of
> gdal comes along I will have to rename it to libgdal2 or something
> similar. Wouldn't it be possible to use such a naming convention for
> grass as well?
>
I wonder also why grassi/gdal folks do not adopt a standard library soname scheme
to avoid breaking things when changing API (a la libtool to say).
> But perhaps Francesco and Paolo are right and we should indeed place
> gdal-grass into the grass package. It shouldn't be too difficult to
> build the plugin within the grass package.
>
That's probably the most straight method.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: