Re: [Pkg-grass-general] [Fwd: Re: compilers that self compile]
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
This seems a very reasonable approach. But what about headers files?
I guess grass57 and gdal requires them each other...
Francesco,
Only the GDAL GRASS driver requires the grass57 include files. My proposal
is that it would be built later as a seperate package (though from the
GDAL source tree). I will go ahead and ensure the GRASS driver can be
built seperately before my GDAL 1.2.4 release.
> code like gcc-libc. Out case is a bit undersized for that. I think
> all the thing is due to an evil architectural approach.
Sheesh, it isn't that evil for packages to inter-operate. Note that this
is not an issue for normal folks building the software as it is easy enough
to build GDAL without GRASS support, install it, build GRASS, install it,
rebuild GDAL with GRASS support, install it.
Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
Reply to: