Re: [Pkg-grass-general] [Fwd: Re: compilers that self compile]
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:12:11PM -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Schuyler Erle wrote:
> >This may be a dumb question, but perhaps GDAL can be built on
> >libgrass5, instead of directly on GRASS?
>
> Folks,
>
> I'm a bit surprised this is such a big deal. GDAL does support dynamically
> loaded raster drivers. So we could have a tiny package which is just
> the GDAL GRASS driver using the grass libraries. It just needs to be
> installed in /usr/lib. If you want to pursue this approach I will need
> to make a few changes to the Makefiles. Let me know.
>
This seems a very reasonable approach. But what about headers files?
I guess grass57 and gdal requires them each other...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: