[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-14



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-14
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #     https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org (was debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #247571 (http://bugs.debian.org/247571)
> # Bug title: Wrong output from legal program, pragma Import (Ada)
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR16077
> #  * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> INVALID
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 247571 + fixed-upstream
Bug #247571 [gnat-14] Wrong output from legal program, pragma Import (Ada)
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 247571 - status-NEW
Usertags were: status-NEW.
There are now no usertags set.
> usertags 247571 + status-RESOLVED resolution-INVALID
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-INVALID.
> # remote status report for #864969 (http://bugs.debian.org/864969)
> # Bug title: Ada.Locales ignores setting of LANG
> #  * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR81243
> #  * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 864969 + fixed-upstream
Bug #864969 [gnat-14] Ada.Locales ignores setting of LANG
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 864969 - status-NEW
Usertags were: status-NEW.
There are now no usertags set.
> usertags 864969 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
247571: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=247571
864969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864969
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: