[Bug c/8081] ICE with variably sized types returned from nested functions
- To: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: [Bug c/8081] ICE with variably sized types returned from nested functions
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:36:56 +0000
- Message-id: <bug-8081-5724-pOoAQrH4oB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- In-reply-to: <bug-8081-5724@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- References: <bug-8081-5724@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8081
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
--- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 08:36:56 UTC ---
> It's of course not that easy as we gimplify before un-nesting. The frontend
> would be responsible to arrange things that way, similar to how we pass
> a return slot in the C++ frontend (DECL_BY_REFERENCE on the DECL_RESULT
> variable). Like for the attached patch. Passes
>
> extern void abort (void);
> int
> main (int argc, char **argv)
> {
> int size = 10;
> typedef struct
> {
> char val[size];
> }
> block;
> block a, b;
> block __attribute__((noinline))
> retframe_block ()
> {
> return *(block *) &b;
> }
> b.val[0] = -1;
> b.val[1] = -2;
> a=retframe_block ();
> if (a.val[0] != -1
> || a.val[1] != -2)
> abort ();
> return 0;
> }
>
> I'm not sure if one can construct a testcase where using return-slot
> optimization causes wrong-code generation. Alternatively checking
> DECL_BY_REFERENCE on the callees DECL_RESULT instead of applying it to
> all VLA types could work (though not for indirect calls).
You should ask specialists. :-) In Ada, we do this routinely and the strategy
used is that of the "forced RSO": we generate INIT_EXPR instead of MODIFY_EXPR
and we create an explicit temporary if we detect potential overlap.
Btw, I don't understand why you're mixing DECL_BY_REFERENCE and RSO here, just
Index: gimplify.c
===================================================================
--- gimplify.c (revision 183104)
+++ gimplify.c (working copy)
@@ -4417,6 +4417,9 @@ gimplify_modify_expr_rhs (tree *expr_p,
/* It's OK to use the target directly if it's being
initialized. */
use_target = true;
+ else if (variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (*to_p), NULL_TREE))
+ /* Always use the target for variable-sized types. */
+ use_target = true;
else if (TREE_CODE (*to_p) != SSA_NAME
&& (!is_gimple_variable (*to_p)
|| needs_to_live_in_memory (*to_p)))
works for me on the testcase.
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Reply to: