On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 23:34, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
> On 04/19/2011 11:11 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>>
>> reopen 621878
>> reassign 621878 gcj-4.4-jdk
>> retitle 621878 gcj-4.4-jdk misses jni_md.h on kfreebsd
>> affects 621878 +db4.6 db4.7 db4.8 db
>> thank you
>>
>> Dear Debian GCC Team please look at http://bugs.debian.org/621878, it
>> looks like jni_md.h header is missing there which is causing FTBFSes
>> for dbX.Y packages.
>>
>> You can find failed build logs here:
>>
>>
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=db&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=5.1.25-2&stamp=1302733739
>>
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=db&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=5.1.25-2&stamp=1302733541
>
> is this a kfreebsd issue?
Version 5.1.25-1 built fine:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=db&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=5.1.25-1&stamp=1297388366
Version 5.1.25-2 started to fail on kfreebsd-{amd64,amd32}. The buildd
failures on ia64, mips, s390 and sparc are of different nature.
The error from 5.1.25-2 build is:
libtool: compile: gcc -c -I. -I../src -I/usr/include/tcl8.5
-D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -Wall
-g -O2 -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -fno-strict-aliasing
../lang/java/libdb_java/db_java_wrap.c -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/db_java_wrap.o
In file included from ../lang/java/libdb_java/db_java_wrap.c:137:0:
/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/jni.h:52:20: fatal error: jni_md.h:
No such file or directory
The same line compiles with lots of warnings, but compiles. So
something must have changed on gcj side between the two builds which
broke it.
> looks more like you are assuming that the default
> version of gcc matches the one for gcj. please reassign back.
Could you please elaborate? Are you trying to say that calling:
> gcc -c -I. -I../src -I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -fno-strict-aliasing ../lang/java/libdb_java/db_java_wrap.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/db_java_wrap.o
is wrong when gcc is different version than gcj? Well the build log
say gcc-4.4 and gcj-4.4-*, so there should be nothing wrong.
O.
--
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
Attachment:
db_5.1.25-1..2.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data