[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#148686: gcj-3.1 should provide /etc/alternatives/javac



Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:02:18AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Michael Koch writes:
> > > Package: gcj-3.1
> > > Version: 1:3.1-2
> > > Severity: normal
> > > 
> > > 
> > > gcj-3.1 should provide /etc/alternatives/javac
> > 
> > yes, but only if gcj supports most of javac's options. Please feel
> > free to submit a gcj-wrapper, which can be used as an javac
> > alternative.
> 
> Should it really provide javac?  Javac is expected to compile to
> bytecode, and gcj doesn't do that.

yes, the wrapper should provide javac, not gcj(1):

       -C  This option is used to tell gcj to generate bytecode
           (.class files) rather than object code.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: