Re: libgnat version might be erroneous
Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> Jérôme Marant writes:
>> Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
>>
>> > jmarant@nerim.net (Jérôme Marant) writes:
>> >
>> >> I've read in the gcc ML that versioning libgnat as 3.15a
>> >> is erroneous, according to Robert Dewar.
>> >
>> > It's still in the GCC CVS...
>>
>> And what's problematic with deciding something on this,
>> from GCC people point of view?
>
> for the packaging, it's currently a non-issue, because we don't have a
> shared libgnat yet. It builds, but you can't use it, because of
Then, I would say that this GNAT is far from being usable.
> undefined references to some libiberty functions. why change the soname,
> if upstream doesn't do it.
Since it has been raised on the list, I wonder why such a simple
issue has not been solved yet.
> you may want to ask why libgnat3.15a exists at all ... well to avoid
> the delay for new packages when filling the gap ;-)
Unless the version changes across 3.1.x releases ;-)
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: