Re: gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?)
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:54:06AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> >
> > > I would like to get feedback, on which alternative to base the gcc-3.1
> > > packages:
> > >
> > > a) 3.1 as to be released (without dwarf2 support)
> >
> > As Redhat has demonstrated in the past, it is highly desirable that
> > the distributed gcc is based on a released gcc as close as possible.
> > If there are serious problems in gcc 3.1-as-released, work with gcc
> > maintainers to fix them in 3.1.1.
>
> Completely seconded. I want the collection of patches that
> distributors ship with GCC to shrink over time, not grow...
I see, I was unclear, the alternatives were hppa specific, I didn't
even think of using anything else than the release ...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: