Re: Kernel 2.2.19 and gcc 2.95.2
Simon Richter writes:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Richard Hirst wrote:
>
> > > The idea is to see whether m68k can live without gcc 2.7.2, since we seem
> > > to be the last platform depending on it and the maintainer wants to drop
> > > the package.
>
> > Oh, sorry - I missed that point. Certainly I've built and run 2.3.x and
> > 2.4.x kernels with a newer compiler - 2.95 IIRC. Don't know about 2.2.
>
> 2.2.19 with current kernel-patch-2.2.19-m68k fails with 2.95.2, so there
> should either be a gcc272 package or a kernel-patch that fixes the issue.
> Since so far the only problem I could see is the missing __muldi3 symbol
> in nfs.o and nfsd.o, that should be easy to fix.
- there is a gcc272 package in unstable.
- we don't have 2.95.2 in unstable anymore. please recheck with 2.95.4
Reply to: