[Freedombox-discuss] Why plug servers and not smart phones?
Quoting Eugen Leitl (2013-07-15 18:54:33)
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 06:39:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > My question was rhetorical, and directed to Robert's strawman.
> > My answer was blind to that strawman, targeted your posts, and
> > addressed it as if your later post quoted above was related to your
> > original question.
> Sorry, not parsing you here. FBX is P2P infrastructure, and as such
> the only reason why FBX is not a good match for mobile alternative
> Android distros is because there is no Android debian project.
Incorrect. FreedomBox is a federated server, not a P2P system.
P2P is applications installed on user-facing devices, talking directly
to similar applications on other user-facing devices.
FreedomBox is a server - i.e. applications (services) talk to similar
applications and to *other* applications (clients) installed on
Both FreedomBox and P2P are different from centralized servers, but in
different ways: P2P puts all burden on the user-facing devices and
requires redesigned protocols, whereas FreedomBox allows continued use
of same client tools and protocols, just stretches federation to an
extreme one-network-per-user structure.
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes