[Freedombox-discuss] Why plug servers and not smart phones?
Quoting Eugen Leitl (2013-07-15 15:25:42)
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:29:12AM +0200, Robert Martinez wrote:
> > FreedomBox should be the server behind the services you use. Because
> > servers are where the main surveillance infrastructure lies.
> Why "should"? What precisely is a server in a P2P cloud?
There are several ways to avoid centralized services. One is to host
services on decentralized servers, another is to avoid client-server
architecture altogether and use P2P architectures instead. Yet another
is to completely avoid always-on networking and instead use sneakernet.
The approach used with FreedomBox is that of decentralized servers.
Extremely decentralized: One server per user.
So in the context of FreedomBox your question does not make sense.
Hope that helps,
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes